Walsingham: Elizabethan Spymaster

Guest article written by: Alan Freer 

Francis Walsingham
Francis Walsingham

Throughout Elizabeth I’s reign England was in constant danger both from external and internal threats. Spain and France looked north and regarded the country as heretic and a potential enemy to their expanding empires. At home, the supporters of Mary Tudor, the late Queen, looked to another Mary, Mary, Queen of Scots, as a Catholic heir to replace the Protestant Elizabeth. In times of crisis a government needs good, accurate and reliable intelligence. That came from one man, Francis Walsingham, Elizabeth’s spymaster.

Walsingham was the only son of William Walsingham of Footscray in Kent, by his wife Joyce, daughter of Sir Edmund Denny. William died the year following Francis’s birth and his mother married Sir John Carey, a distant relation by marriage of Anne Boleyn’s family. Francis went to King’s College, Cambridge in 1548, but left two years later having failed to take his degree.

From 1550 to 1552 he travelled abroad and succeeded in becoming fluent in both French and Italian. Soon after he returned to England, Mary Tudor ascended the throne and Francis found himself on the wrong side of the religious tracks. Fearing arrest for his outspoken, Protestant views, he decided it prudent to return abroad. His mother’s family were strong Protestants and most of his tutors at Cambridge were of the same denomination, so he was a natural target for Mary and an equally natural supporter of her sister, Elizabeth. He is even thought to have been involved in a minor way in the anti-Catholic plots of John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland, to place Lady Jane Grey on the throne.

Over the next nine years he travelled extensively in Italy and central Europe, studying law and politics. The methods he learnt at the various Italian Courts were to serve him well in the years to come.

Elizabeth, 1560

By 1560, with Elizabeth as Queen, he was back in England and in 1562 was returned as Member of Parliament for Lyme Regis. That same year he married a widow, Ann Carteill but she died two years later, leaving him without children. In 1566 he married the widow of Sir Richard Worsley and by her he had a daughter, Frances. She would later marry Sir Philip Sidney and, after his death, Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex.

At the age of 36 Francis came to the notice of Elizabeth’s first minister, William Cecil, who offered him a position at Court. He soon took charge of the small network of secret agents Cecil had established and so started twenty-two years of loyal, unswerving service to his Queen. Elizabeth nicknamed him her “Moor” because of his swarthy complexion and habitual black clothing. She was occasionally his guest at his home in Surrey and although they did not always agree on policy, she trusted him implicitly.

In 1570 Cecil sent him as ambassador to Paris where he was involved with the negotiations for several treaties. He was in the city when the Huguenots were murdered in the Massacre of St. Bartholomew (August 24, 1572) which reinforced his hatred of foreign Catholic regimes. He was recalled from Paris in 1573 and appointed Secretary of State, a post he held until his death. The modern-day equivalent would be Foreign Secretary and head of MI5 and 6. He was the Elizabethan “M”. Walsingham’s two great hates were Spain and Mary, Queen of Scots; Spain as a threat to his country and Mary as a threat to his Queen. He was convinced that England could only be safe with the complete defeat of Spain and the removal of Mary.

Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots
Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots

To this end he expanded the network of spies to over fifty agents, much of it paid for from his own pocket. He soon had agents in the courts of France, Spain, the Low Countries, Germany, the United Provinces and even in Turkey. He was like a black spider at the centre of a great web. Elizabeth was reluctant to move against her cousin, Mary, but Walsingham had no such qualms.

Late in 1585 a trainee Catholic priest named Gilbert Gifford, was intercepted coming from France through the port of Rye. He was taken to Walsingham who learnt that Gifford was to act as messenger between Mary and her supporters on the Continent. Walsingham turned Gifford and persuaded him to work for the Government. He was to tell Mary that a system for smuggling letters and papers between her and Europe had been set up. In fact the Spymaster himself constructed this route so that all correspondence passed through his hands before it crossed the Channel. Walsingham’s secretary, Thomas Phelipps, was an expert code breaker so all Mary’s communications were monitored.

In May 1586 Mary sent two letters, one to the Spanish ambassador, Mendoza, giving her support to an invasion of England, while the other was to a supporter, Charles Paget, asking him to remind Philip II of Spain of the urgency for invasion. Both passed through Walsingham hands. The following month Sir Anthony Babington and a Catholic priest, John Ballard, were heard discussing the proposed Spanish invasion and the plot to murder Elizabeth.

William Cecil, NPG
William Cecil

All this evidence still did not implicate Mary directly in a plot against Elizabeth. On 17 July Walsingham received what he had been waiting for – a letter, in reply to one from Babington, written by Mary giving her approval to the plot to murder the Queen. Walsingham moved quickly. Ballard and Babington were arrested and placed in the Tower of London. Others implicated in the plot were rapidly placed under lock and key. On 13 September the conspirators were tried and condemned and a week later Babington, Ballard and five others were dragged on hurdles to St. Giles Field, Holborn where, in front of a large crowd, they were hanged, drawn and quartered.

Despite Walsingham’s proof, Elizabeth was still reluctant to take action against Mary. In October both Houses of Parliament demanded Mary’s head but Elizabeth would not sign. She even pleaded that some way be found to deal with Mary without the need for execution. Both Cecil, by now Lord Burghley, and Walsingham were determined that this should not happen. Together, with the support of the Council of State, they brought constant pressure on the Queen until she eventually signed the warrant on 1st February 1587. Her intention seems to have been to hold the signed warrant as a threat against Mary but Walsingham would have none of it. At 8 o’clock on the morning of Wednesday, 8th February 1587 Mary, Queen of Scots was executed in the Great Hall of Fotheringhay Castle. On Walsingham’s orders the body was stripped of all clothing which was burnt, so that no relic survived, and encased in lead.

When she was told of the execution, Elizabeth was furious. Both Cecil and Walsingham were in extreme danger from their monarch’s temper. She refused to see them and, for a while, Cecil dare not go to Court.

Walsingham, meanwhile, was hard at work preparing for the inevitable invasion by Spain; an invasion, as we all know, through the skill of English seamen and the luck of the weather, never came. Cecil acknowledged the debt England owed this worker behind the scenes when he said, “you have fought more with your pen than many here in our English navy with their enemies.”

800px-Queen_Elizabeth_I;_Sir_Francis_Walsingham;_William_Cecil,_1st_Baron_Burghley_by_William_Faithorne_(2)
Cecil, Queen Elizabeth & Walsingham

Elizabeth was notoriously sparing with honours for her public servants. Only one, William Cecil, received a peerage. Francis Walsingham was knighted in 1577 and he received the honorary appointments of Chancellor of the Order of the Garter and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster.

When he died on 6th April 1590, the news was carried to Philip II of Spain via a letter from one of his agents in England. The agent wrote, “Secretary Walsingham has just expired, at which there is much sorrow.” Philip commented in the margin of the letter, “There yes. But it is good news here.”

 

About the Author:

CaptureI am Alan Freer and live in the small village of Byfleet, Surrey, England. Edward, the Black Prince, spent much of his final years in Byfleet. I have been an amateur “historian” since the age of seven, when I purchased my first history book in 1955. Indeed, it was anticipated that I would become a history teacher, but a brief conversation just before I was due to go to university directed me to the banking industry – more lucrative but, perhaps, not so satisfying! History lead me into genealogy and I have my own website detailing the Descendents of William the Conqueror (www.william1.co.uk ). A never-ending project! When I retired from the bank in 1999 I started to write and have had a number of articles published in US history magazines or on magazine websites. Primarily I wrote for the amusement of my colleagues in my second occupation as a civil servant. I count myself most fortunate to have been born in England and would not wish it otherwise – except, possibly, Italy!!

 

7 thoughts on “Walsingham: Elizabethan Spymaster

  1. Geni shows Francis as my 13th or 14th great uncle so his father would by my 15th ggf. Strange to see him depicted on every screen in the country. DCR

  2. Walsingham was a bigiot and a malicilous evil man whose hatred of Queen Mary of Scotland (MQOS( blinded him to reason and justice it was he with Cecil and their secretary mastermind and fabricates and put the false information against Queen Mary in the so called Badington plot there was nothing in Queen Mary’s hand writing which she correctly stated at her farce of a trial it was second hand writing no court today would convict Mary on such very flawed and weak evidence. as a sovereign Queen of a foreign country and the legitimate and rightful Queen of England it isudicious to have charged Queen Mary of treason . Queen Mary was illegially held againat her will and England had no legal or moral right to imprision her nevr mind try her and murder her.England owed Queen Mary its obiedance and allegiance it is rather ironic that the very country who murdered her gave her a royal state funeral oaid for by the english government with the countess of Bedford as Elizabeth’s personal representative. I have never known anyone who was sent to the scaffold for treason being accorded such an honour by the state who executed them . An admission of guilt and it is very apt it was Queen Mary’s son King James VI who inherited the english throne that belonged to his mother uniting both the crowns of Scotland and England and its Queen Mary’s bloodline that flows into our present Queen Elizaberh every monarch of Great Britain desend from Queen Mary and many of europes monarchs also. Those who committed treason against their lawfully legitimate and righrful Queen will on the day of judgrment answer for tbeir crime of falsly accusing rebelling and commiting regicide against thier and Gods annoited Queen .as Queen Mary warned the thearte of the world is wider than the realm of England and in my end is my beginning. Queen Mary won in the end her tomb in Westminster Abbey which have had the privilage of standing beside is tbe most magnificent and imposing and most visited of all say it.

  3. I love history and his sisters archeology and genealogy.
    My main i terest is Ireland and England. My family name is Henry and even though they ended up in Ireland I believe they came from England or Scotland.

  4. Thank you Alan. Good enlightening piece. I noticed that you do not mention the Duke of Norfolk’s role in these treason plot. However the level of detail was interesting in such a short text.

  5. Fortunate you to have been born in Britain! I wish I had been, because I love history too, and count myself an armchair historian. However, the oldest history here in the USA is not too much older than 350 years or so. So, I depend on people like you to give me fascinating glimpses of the far distant past. Thank you so much for your post. I look forward to more!

    1. Suzanne, we must not forget the Native Americans and their history. They have been here much longer than the Europeans. But I understand where you’re coming from. English architecture brings history to life, and we don’t have that in the U.S. – except on the east coast. Thanks for following!

      1. Oh, yes, of course! Never to forget those brave people. And I am not being facetious, there. But I was thinking mainly about the architecture and writings (I.e., Bede). Thanks.

Please Login to Comment.