Book Review: Prince of York – A Story of Reginald Pole by Samantha Wilcoxson

Jane Seymour (7)

Reginald Pole may have come from the royal blood of the House of York but that wouldn’t save him from the wrath of his cousin, King Henry VIII.

I have known Samantha Wilcoxson for a couple of years now and I was very excited when she offered me an ARC (advance review copy) of her new book, “Prince of York”. All of her novels and novellas are fantastic and her writing style seems almost effortless. Once you begin reading it’s hard to put one of her books down.

This would be the first of Wilcoxson’s Tudor-related books to feature a man as the main character. Something I have learned from my own experience is not always as easy as writing from a perspective that you can truly relate to.

Back Story

From a past article I wrote about Reginald to catch you up on his story:

Reginald Pole was born at Stourton Castle, Staffordshire, on 3 March 1500, to Margaret Plantagenet and Sir Richard Pole. Reginald was the grandson of George, Duke of Clarence (Isabel Neville) and great-nephew to both King Edward IV and King Richard III. ?To say he had royal blood in his veins would be an understatement. Unfortunately, after the execution of his grandfather, the Duke of Clarence, his family name was severely tarnished and Clarence?s lands and titles were forfeited.

When Reginald?s uncle, Richard III was killed at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485, Henry VII became King of England. At the time it was imperative for all the Yorkist supporters to move into the shadows and not to interfere with the Tudor reign. With all that being said, Henry VII?arranged a marriage for Margaret Plantagenet to Sir Richard Pole. Sir Richard Pole was considered a safe marriage for Margaret ? he was related to My Lady, the King?s Mother, Margaret Beaufort through her half-sister (Edith St. John), who was Sir Richard Pole?s mother. By marrying Margaret Plantagenet?into the family it?would make it more difficult for plotters to use Margaret as a figurehead for their Yorkist cause.

Margaret and Richard went on to have five children together: Henry, Reginald, Geoffrey, Arthur and?Ursula Pole. In 1504/5, Sir Richard Pole died.?After his death, Margaret was left to raise five children with a?limited amount of land inherited from her husband. She had no salary and no prospects.

With Margaret?s limited funds?Henry?VII was nice enough to pay for the funeral of his cousin, Sir Richard?Pole.

Margaret Pole was first cousin to Henry VII?s late wife, Elizabeth of York ? in a way, she was family?and probably reminded Henry VII of his wife as well.

To ease the financial burden, Margaret?devoted her third son,?Reginald Pole (age 5) to the Church. Nonetheless, Reginald would bitterly resent her abandonment of him later in life.??Additionally, Margaret, without adequate means to support herself and her children,?was forced to live at Syon Abbey among Bridgettine nuns after her husband?s death.?She remained at the abbey until her return to favor at the ascension of Henry VIII in 1509.

Reginald Pole was once a favorite of his cousin, Henry VIII. The king even paid for half of Reginald?s schooling at one time. However, when Reginald rejected any divorce discussion regarding Katherine of Aragon, spoke poorly of Anne Boleyn and then refused to sign the Oath of Supremacy, he enraged Henry. Henry turned on Reginald and attacked his family in England instead ? since?Reginald was out of the king?s reach.

Between 1537 and 1539 the Pope ordered Reginald?on two diplomatic missions to persuade Europe?s Catholic monarchs to ally against Henry VIII. Both?of his missions?were unsuccessful, and Henry, in revenge for Pole?s treasonous activities, executed Pole?s brother, Henry Pole, Lord Montagu at the end of 1538, and his cousin Henry Courtenay, Marquess of Exeter in the beginning of 1539. In 1541 he also executed Margaret Pole, Reginald?s mother.

This is where Wilcoxson’s story begins, in 1541.

My Review

Being at the top of King Henry VIII’s most wanted list in 1541 would have caused worry for anyone. Reginald Pole was not just anyone – he was a very pious man who did not fear death. He welcomed it.

Pole was protected by Pope Paul III, who was kind enough to supply guards to keep Reginald safe. While he appreciated the safety measures put in place he put all his faith in God’s will. His strong faith in God was one of the things that struck me the most about this book.

Reginald Pole was not an overly ambitious man like so many of his ancestors had been. As Cardinal Pole, Reginald had a chance to become Pope after the death of Paul III, and even then he would not push his cause by making agreements and deals with others to get the coveted spot. That aspect of the story left me respecting Pole as I never had in the past.

Another interesting aspect of this story is that Reginald has some pretty fantastic relationships in Italy. Top of the list (for me) was Michelangelo. I loved the way Wilcoxson built the friendship between the two men. I honestly do not know much about Michelangelo and this left me wanting to learn more about his life. There is also mention of a woman by the name of Vittoria Collona who was an Italian noblewoman and poet. After her death 1547 it caused other female poets to publish their material to fill the void that had been left by her absence. Wilcoxson did a fantastic job building the secondary characters so that the reader is left wanting more and more.

If you’re looking for a book that is different from your normal subject matter I highly recommend checking out “Prince of York” by Samantha Wilcoxson. It will fill in some gaps from other stories that you may have read in the past.

Another masterpiece by Samantha Wilcoxson that shows the depths of Henry VIII’s vindictiveness which is contrasted by the piety of Reginald Pole.

The Prince of York is now available on Amazon.

Book Review: Queen of Martyrs by Samantha Wilcoxson

Jane Seymour (24)

Author Samantha Wilcoxson recently released the third and final installment of her Plantagenet Embers series with “Queen of Martyrs – The Story of Mary I” and it is a marvelous representation of the lady that will go down in history (whether unfairly) as “Bloody Mary”.

 

Here is a brief synopsis of the book from its Amazon page:

God save the Queen! God save our good Queen Mary!’

When these words rang out over England, Mary Tudor thought her troubles were over. She could put her painful past – the loss of her mother and mistreatment at the hands of her father – behind her.

With her accession to the throne, Mary set out to restore Catholicism in England and find the love of a husband that she had long desired. But the tragedies in Mary’s life were far from over. How did a gentle, pious woman become known as ‘Bloody Mary’?

The thing I enjoyed the most from this book was that Wilcoxson made Mary a real person through her story telling. This book doesn’t focus on Mary being a victim as we are so accustomed to reading. It shows a strength and naivety in Mary that makes her as human as you and I.

From young on Mary had an extreme desire to be loved and to be close with her family.

While her brother Edward was king of England Mary felt like a young mother to her even younger brother. She felt a need to protect Edward from those around him. Unfortunately, Mary’s visits with her brother eventually became few and far between when those closest to him discovered that the young king respected the opinion of his Catholic sister.

Not long before the death of Edward Mary paid visit to her cousin Lady Jane Grey – the former ward of Thomas Seymour and his wife dowager queen, Katherine Parr. Both Mary and Jane had spent time in the home of Katherine at Chelsea and had shared memories of a great lady who treated them fairly. Mary felt that Katherine had treated her so well that when she discovered that Katherine’s funeral was done in the new faith she felt betrayed by her step-mother. However, visiting with Jane allowed Mary to share memories her happy memories of Katherine with her.

Sadly, unbeknownst to Mary, Edward has declared Lady Jane Grey as his heir. This surprise was told to Mary by Jane’s mother ?(and Mary’s cousin), Frances Grey, Duchess of Suffolk.

The story continues showing Mary as a merciful queen. Not only did she attempt to spare Jane twice but she also publicly ?pardoned hundreds of men who rose up against her in Wyatt’s Rebellion. ?Regrettably, Jane’s father fought against the queen which cost him, his daughter and son in law their lives.

I thoroughly enjoyed this book and would highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in learning more about Mary Tudor and the workings of the Tudor court. I cannot say enough nice things about this book.

Five out of Five Stars!

Rebecca

About the Author:

Samantha Wilcoxson is an American writer with British roots. When she is not reading or travelling, she enjoys spending time at the lake with her husband and three teenagers.

The Plantagenet Embers series debuted with ‘Plantagenet Princess, Tudor Queen: The Story of Elizabeth of York’. It has been selected as an Editors’ Choice by the Historical Novel Society and long-listed for the 2016 HNS Indie Award.

‘Faithful Traitor: The Story of Margaret Pole’ is the second novel in the trilogy, continuing the story of the Plantagenet remnant in Tudor times. This novel has received 5-stars from Readers’ Favorite and a Discovering Diamond award.

The recently released final installment in Plantagenet Embers, Queen of Martyrs, features Queen Mary I and her story of the counter-reformation in England.

 

 

 

 

 

 

—-

Facebook no longer shows our posts to a majority of our followers - Don't want to miss out on new articles? Get notified! Subscribe to email updates from Tudors Dynasty.

Join 5,001 subscribers.

Mary and Reginald: What could have been?

Guest post by Samantha Wilcoxson for Tudors Dynasty

Queen Mary I has gone down in history as ‘Bloody Mary’ thanks to her persecution of Protestants and rebellions against her choice of husband. We may think that marrying the man of her choice is the lesser crime through our modern worldview, but sixteenth century Englishmen were far more concerned about having a Spanish ruler than returning to Catholicism. What if Mary had made a different choice?

When Mary became queen, one of the first issues that she was required to address was her marriage. Though several betrothals had come and gone throughout her thirty-seven years of life, neither her father nor her brother had wished to legitimize her position by giving her a spouse. Finally, the decision was up to Mary herself. She chose Prince Philip of Spain, which turned out to be a disaster.

Philip was the son of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor and nephew of Catherine of Aragon. The family connection and shared faith made the match desirable to Mary, and she refused to listen to any advice to the contrary. She was warned that people would not accept Spanish rule, but Mary insisted that she herself would rule England and the child she was hoping to bear would follow her.

Of course, Mary failed to bear an heir and Philip led English troops against the French, just as had been feared. Mary had lacked the foresight and political acumen to discern how poor of a choice Philip was for her. But who else could she have chosen?

One popular candidate for Mary’s hand was Edward Courtenay. This York cousin had been imprisoned since the Exeter Conspiracy of 1538 but was released upon Mary’s accession in 1553. Mary was hesitant to marry a man who had spent his formative years in prison and was a decade younger than herself regardless of how much Bishop Gardiner, who had been imprisoned at the same time, encouraged the match. Courtenay was found flitting around the edges of conspiracy often enough to be sent away to Padua where he died in 1556.

Another possible suitor was brought from Italy to assist with Mary’s counter-reformation. Cardinal Reginald Pole was another distant cousin of Mary’s on the York side of the family. His mother, Margaret Pole Countess of Salisbury, had been Mary’s governess and a close friend of Catherine of Aragon. The mothers had proposed that the two be betrothed when they were much younger, but Henry had not been interested in making the match. He had likely seen the pairing as too much of a threat to his son’s rule, but, with Edward dead, Reginald could have been the ideal choice.

Had Mary been wed to Reginald, the counter-reformation could have gone on much as it had, but without the sideshow of rebellions against Spanish rule. Englishmen expected Mary to return her kingdom to the old faith and rid it of heretics. They would have known it when they supported her against Lady Jane Grey, but they had not expected her to marry a foreigner. With Reginald at her side instead of Philip, the 284 burnings would have been a footnote in history, no more notable than actions taking place throughout Europe as rulers struggled to cope with the Reformation.

That being said, it may be assuming that history would change too much because of one wedding instead of another to say that Mary could have born a son with Reginald as she failed to do with Philip. Instead, the couple likely would have died childless, and still on the same day, November 17, 1558. England would have been saved events such as Wyatt’s Rebellion but would still see the accession of Protestant Queen Elizabeth I. Sometimes, there is no way of avoiding fate.

About the Author:

profile pic

Samantha Wilcoxson is the author of the Plantagenet Embers Trilogy. An incurable bibliophile and sufferer of wanderlust, she lives in Michigan with her husband and three teenagers. She lives in Michigan with her husband and three children. You can connect with Samantha at SamanthaWilcoxson.BlogSpot.com or on Twitter @Carpe_Librum.

Purchase her newest book, Queen of Martyrs: The Story of Mary I (Plantagenet Embers Book 3) on Amazon.com


Facebook no longer shows our posts to a majority of our followers - Don't want to miss out on new articles? Get notified! Subscribe to email updates from Tudors Dynasty.

Join 5,001 subscribers.